‘Android’ Tagged Posts

Comfortable 10th anniversary, Android

It’s been 10 years since Google took the wraps off the G1, the primary Android telephone. Since that point the OS has grown from buggy, nerdy iPhon...

 

It’s been 10 years since Google took the wraps off the G1, the primary Android telephone. Since that point the OS has grown from buggy, nerdy iPhone various to arguably the preferred (or not less than populous) computing platform on the planet. But it surely certain as heck didn’t get there with out hitting a number of bumps alongside the highway.

Be part of us for a quick retrospective on the final decade of Android units: the great, the unhealthy, and the Nexus Q.

HTC G1 (2008)

That is the one which began all of it, and I’ve a gentle spot in my coronary heart for the outdated factor. Often known as the HTC Dream — this was again once we had an HTC, you see — the G1 was about as inauspicious a debut as you possibly can think about. Its full keyboard, trackball, barely janky slide-up display (crooked even in official photographs), and appreciable girth marked it from the outset as a telephone solely an actual geek might love. In comparison with the iPhone, it was like a poorly dressed whale.

However in time its half-baked software program matured and its idiosyncrasies turned obvious for the sensible touches they have been. To this present day I sometimes lengthy for a trackball or full keyboard, and whereas the G1 wasn’t fairly, it was robust as hell.

Moto Droid (2009)

In fact, most individuals didn’t give Android a re-evaluation till Moto got here out with the Droid, a slicker, thinner system from the maker of the famed RAZR. Looking back, the Droid wasn’t that significantly better or completely different than the G1, however it was thinner, had a greater display, and had the good thing about an infinite advertising and marketing push from Motorola and Verizon. (Disclosure: Verizon owns Oath, which owns Exadrive, however this doesn’t have an effect on our protection in any approach.)

For a lot of, the Droid and its quick descendants have been the primary Android telephones they’d — one thing new and attention-grabbing that blew the likes of Palm out of the water, but in addition occurred to be so much cheaper than an iPhone.

HTC/Google Nexus One (2010)

This was the fruit of the continued collaboration between Google and HTC, and the primary telephone Google branded and bought itself. The Nexus One was meant to be the slick, high-quality system that might lastly compete toe-to-toe with the iPhone. It ditched the keyboard, obtained a cool new OLED display, and had a beautiful clean design. Sadly it bumped into two issues.

First, the Android ecosystem was starting to get crowded. Individuals had plenty of decisions and will choose up telephones for affordable that might do the fundamentals. Why lay the money out for a flowery new one? And second, Apple would shortly launch the iPhone four, which — and I used to be an Android fanboy on the time — objectively blew the Nexus One and every part else out of the water. Apple had introduced a gun to a knife struggle.

HTC Evo 4G (2010)

One other HTC? Nicely, this was prime time for the now-defunct firm. They have been taking dangers nobody else would, and the Evo 4G was no exception. It was, for the time, big: the iPhone had a three.5-inch display, and most Android units weren’t a lot larger, in the event that they weren’t smaller.

The Evo 4G by some means survived our criticism (our alarm now appears extraordinarily quaint, given the scale of the typical telephone now) and was a fairly well-liked telephone, however finally is notable not for breaking gross sales information however breaking the seal on the concept that a telephone might be huge and nonetheless make sense. (Honorable point out goes to the Droid X.)

Samsung Galaxy S (2010)

Samsung’s huge debut made a hell of a splash, with customized variations of the telephone showing within the shops of virtually each provider, every with their very own title and design: the AT&T Captivate, T-Cellular Vibrant, Verizon Fascinate, and Dash Epic 4G. As if the Android lineup wasn’t complicated sufficient already on the time!

Although the S was a stable telephone, it wasn’t with out its flaws, and the iPhone four made for very robust competitors. However robust gross sales bolstered Samsung’s dedication to the platform, and the Galaxy collection remains to be going robust immediately.

Motorola Xoom (2011)

This was an period wherein Android units have been responding to Apple, and never vice versa as we discover immediately. So it’s no shock that sizzling on the heels of the unique iPad we discovered Google pushing a tablet-focused model of Android with its associate Motorola, which volunteered to be the guinea pig with its short-lived Xoom pill.

Though there are nonetheless Android tablets on sale immediately, the Xoom represented a lifeless finish in improvement — an try and carve a chunk out of a market Apple had basically invented and shortly dominated. Android tablets from Motorola, HTC, Samsung and others have been hardly ever something greater than sufficient, although they bought properly sufficient for some time. This illustrated the impossibility of “main from behind” and prompted system makers to specialize relatively than take part in a commodity melee.

Amazon Kindle Hearth (2011)

And who higher for instance than Amazon? Its contribution to the Android world was the Hearth collection of tablets, which differentiated themselves from the remaining by being extraordinarily low-cost and straight targeted on consuming digital media. Simply $ 200 at launch and much much less later, the Hearth units catered to the common Amazon buyer whose youngsters have been pestering them about getting a pill on which to play Fruit Ninja or Indignant Birds, however who didn’t need to shell out for an iPad.

Seems this was a sensible technique, and naturally one Amazon was uniquely positioned to do with its big presence in on-line retail and the power to subsidize the value out of the attain of competitors. Hearth tablets have been by no means notably good, however they have been good sufficient, and for the value you paid, that was form of a miracle.

Xperia Play (2011)

Sony has all the time had a tough time with Android. Its Xperia line of telephones for years have been thought of competent — I owned a number of myself — and arguably industry-leading within the digicam division. However nobody purchased them. And the one they purchased the least of, or not less than proportional to the hype it obtained, needs to be the Xperia Play. This factor was purported to be a cellular gaming platform, and the thought of a slide-out keyboard is nice — however the entire thing principally cratered.

What Sony had illustrated was that you simply couldn’t simply piggyback on the recognition and variety of Android and launch regardless of the hell you needed. Telephones didn’t promote themselves, and though the thought of enjoying Ps video games in your telephone might need sounded cool to some nerds, it was by no means going to be sufficient to make it a million-seller. And more and more that’s what telephones wanted to be.

Samsung Galaxy Be aware (2012)

As a type of pure climax to the swelling telephone development, Samsung went all out with the primary true “phablet,” and regardless of groans of protest the telephone not solely bought properly however turned a staple of the Galaxy collection. In reality, it wouldn’t be lengthy earlier than Apple would comply with on and produce a Plus-sized telephone of its personal.

The Be aware additionally represented a step in direction of utilizing a telephone for critical productiveness, not simply on a regular basis smartphone stuff. It wasn’t fully profitable — Android simply wasn’t able to be extremely productive — however looking back it was ahead pondering of Samsung to make a go at it and start to ascertain productiveness as a core competence of the Galaxy collection.

Google Nexus Q (2012)

This abortive effort by Google to unfold Android out right into a platform was a part of plenty of ill-considered decisions on the time. Nobody actually knew, apparently at Google or anyplace elsewhere on the planet, what this factor was purported to do. I nonetheless don’t. As we wrote on the time:

Right here’s the issue with the Nexus Q:  it’s a stunningly stunning piece of that’s being let down by the software program that’s supposed to manage it.

It was made, or relatively almost made within the USA, although, so it had that going for it.

HTC First — “The Fb Telephone” (2013)

The First obtained dealt a foul hand. The telephone itself was a beautiful piece of with an understated design and daring colours that caught out. However its default launcher, the doomed Fb Residence, was hopelessly unhealthy.

How unhealthy? Introduced in April, discontinued in Might. I keep in mind visiting an AT&T retailer throughout that transient interval and even then the workers had been instructed in disable Fb’s launcher and reveal the peerlessly good telephone beneath. The excellent news was that there have been so few of those telephones bought new that all the inventory began promoting for peanuts on Ebay and the like. I purchased two and used them for my early experiments in ROMs. No regrets.

HTC One/M8 (2014)

This was the start of the tip for HTC, however their previous few years noticed them replace their design language to one thing that really rivaled Apple. The One and its successors have been good telephones, although HTC oversold the “Ultrapixel” digicam, which turned out to not be that good, not to mention iPhone-beating.

As Samsung more and more dominated, Sony plugged away, and LG and Chinese language firms more and more entered the fray, HTC was below assault and even a stable telephone collection just like the One couldn’t compete. 2014 was a transition interval with outdated producers dying out and the dominant ones taking up, ultimately resulting in the market we’ve immediately.

Google/LG Nexus 5X and Huawei 6P (2015)

This was the road that introduced Google into the race in earnest. After the bungled Nexus Q launch, Google wanted to return out swinging, they usually did that by marrying their extra pedestrian with some software program that really zinged. Android 5 was a dream to make use of, Marshmallow had options that we liked … and the telephones turned objects that we adored.

We referred to as the 6P “the crown jewel of Android units”. This was when Google took its telephones to the following stage and by no means appeared again.

Google Pixel (2016)

If the Nexus was, in earnest, the beginning gun for Google’s entry into the race, the Pixel line might be its victory lap. It’s an honest-to-god competitor to the Apple telephone.

Gone are the times when Google is enjoying catch-up on options to Apple, as a substitute, Google’s a contender in its personal proper. The telephone’s digicam is superb. The software program works comparatively seamlessly (carry again visitor mode!), and telephone’s dimension and energy are every part anybody might ask for. The sticker value, like Apple’s latest iPhones, remains to be a little bit of a shock, however this telephone is the teleological endpoint within the Android quest to rival its well-known, fruitful, contender.

Let’s see what the following ten years carry.

In-app purchases are coming to Fb’s Immediate Video games on Android and the online

 

Fb is including help for in-app purchases to its Immediate Video games platform, the corporate introduced throughout a session on gaming at its F8 developer convention this afternoon. The function will enable sport builders so as to add one other type of monetization past promoting to their video games on choose platforms, however not on iOS.

As a substitute, help for in-app purchases can be out there to Immediate Video games on Android and on Fb.com on the internet.

First launched in 2016, Fb opened up Immediate Video games to all builders final month. The platform permits builders to construct mobile-friendly video games utilizing HTML5 that work throughout each Fb and Messenger. The concept is to provide sport builders entry to a different sizable platform for his or her work, along with the prevailing app shops run by Apple and Google.

Fb has had in-app purchases on its roadmap for Immediate Video games for a while, and started testing the function with choose builders round six months in the past.

Much like the app shops, the income share mannequin for Immediate Video games is 70/30 on Fb.com. Nevertheless, on cellular, the video games will comply with the in-app billing phrases from every platform, the corporate notes. Meaning purchases made in video games working on Android gadgets, the 30 p.c income share will apply after the usual cellular platform income share – aka Google’s personal 70/30 reduce.

That’s not ideally suited, after all. And all of the fingers within the pie might result in sport builders pricing their in-app purchases larger, consequently.

Fb appears to acknowledge this concern in its weblog submit announcement, saying: “Our main purpose is to construct [in-app purchases] in a means in order that our developer companions can maintain and develop, and we’ll proceed to judge rev/share with that purpose in thoughts.”

Fb wouldn’t verify if or when help for in-app purchases is coming to iOS.

Along with serving to builders generate income exterior of utilizing advertisements of their video games, in-app purchases in video games may show helpful to Fb as nicely. The corporate’s cost income has dwindled through the years, with issues like Messenger funds by no means actually seeing vital consideration. Plus, Fb made it doable for third-parties like PayPal to function over Messenger, which signaled its disinterest within the funds house usually.

In-app purchases in video games turns issues round, a bit.

The submission course of for in-app purchases will confide in builders on Might 7, permitting them to implement the monetization options on Android and the online. Within the meantime, Fb is providing documentation in regards to the function right here.

Android beats iOS in smartphone loyalty, research finds

 

Samsung’s new Galaxy S9 could not fairly dwell as much as the iPhone X in the case of Samsung’s implementation of a Face ID-style system or its odd tackle AR emoji. However that’s not going to matter a lot to Samsung system homeowners – not solely as a result of the S9 is an efficient smartphone total, however as a result of Android customers simply aren’t switching to iPhone anymore. Actually, Android customers have increased loyalty than iOS customers do, in line with a brand new report right this moment from Shopper Intelligence Analysis Companions (CIRP).

The analysis agency discovered that Android model loyalty has been remaining steadily excessive since early 2016, and stays on the highest ranges ever seen.

Immediately, Android has a 91 % loyalty fee, in contrast with 86 % for iOS, measured as the share of U.S. clients who stayed with their working system once they upgraded their telephone in 2017.

From January 2016 via December 2017, Android loyalty ranged from 89 to 91 % (ending at 91%), whereas iOS loyalty was a number of share factors decrease, starting from 85 to 88 %.

Explains Mike Levin, Accomplice and Co-Founding father of CIRP, customers have just about settled on their model of alternative at this level.

“With solely two cellular working methods at this level, it seems customers now decide one, be taught it, spend money on apps and storage, and keep it up. Now, Apple and Google want to determine find out how to
promote services to those loyal buyer bases,” he mentioned.

That’s additionally why each corporations have more and more grow to be targeted on providers, as they attempt to extract bigger revenues from their respective consumer bases. For Apple, that’s been a win, financially talking – it noticed report income from providers in November, suggesting progress in issues like Apple Music, Apple Pay, iCloud, AppleCare, and App Retailer.

For Android customers, the upper model loyalty might be chalked as much as their means to modify to totally different kinds of recent telephones, with out having to depart Android – due to its distribution throughout quite a lot of handsets. That provides customers the liberty to check out new experiences, with out giving up their investments in bought apps, or the time they’ve spent studying their means round Android, for that matter.

It’s price noting that Android hasn’t at all times led in consumer loyalty because it does now. CIRP has been monitoring these metrics for years, and issues was once the opposite means round.

In 2013, for instance, iPhone homeowners had been discovered to be extra loyal than Android customers. However that shifted the next 12 months, and Android has risen ever since. (By the best way when you click on via to learn the feedback on that linked AllThingsD article from 2013, it’s a fairly a visit. Keep in mind when folks cared a lot about their alternative of smartphone, it led to commenting wars? Ah, the nice ol’ days.)

All that being mentioned, the speed of switching is totally different from the entire variety of folks switching, the agency additionally identified. And looking out the numbers from that perspective adjustments issues.

“We all know Android has a bigger base of customers than iOS, and due to that bigger base, the
absolute variety of customers that swap to iOS from Android is as giant or bigger than the
absolute variety of customers that swap to Android from iOS,” mentioned Levin.”Taking a look at absolute variety of customers on this means tends to assist claims that iOS positive factors extra former Android customers,
than Android does former iOS customers.”

Russia’s Yandex says complained to EU over Google’s Android

 

Russia's Yandex says complained to EU over Google's Android

Moscow (Reuters) -. largest search site Russian Yandex said on Friday that it asked the European Commission to investigate Google’s practices related to its Android mobile operating system in the European Union

The formal request was submitted in April 2015 and largely reflected claims the Russian company against the US software group in a Russian anti-monopoly case Yandex won

(Reporting by Maria Kiselyova; Editing by Jason Bush).